- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:20, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Wichaar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Tagged as having unclear notability since July 2009. It has no independant, reliable sources to assert notability. EuroPride (talk) 18:36, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The article is promotional in nature with statements like: "So we hope that it will the harbinger of other Shahmukhi Punjabi websites to fulfil the needs of 90 million Punjabi people that live in Pakistan." It makes unreferenced claims to notability, but after searching I have not been able to verify any of them. Notability is not established for this website. ~~ GB fan ~~ talk 19:22, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. —Rankiri (talk) 18:57, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.